![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is a 390 block the same as THE 427 BLK
The basic outside dimensions of the block are the same for all FE's, but that's where the similarities end.
__________________
![]() Doug 07 Shelby GT500 coupe, black with tungsten stripes and black with red insert interior 68 427 Tunnel Port fastback 68 mustang coupe 95 SVT Cobra 77 Cobra II drag car Formerly 67 GT500 #899 |
|
||||
|
Re: Is a 390 block the same as THE 427 BLK
Agreed. There are many detail changes as the result of lessons learned in racing (cross bolted mains and the "side oiler" design change are probably the most significant). The final versions of the 427 were the result of their philosophy of constantly improving the breed.
__________________
Roy Simkins '67 G.T. 500 67400F7A03040 '66 G.T. 350 H SFM6S817 |
|
||||
|
Re: Is a 390 block the same as THE 427 BLK
Would also add that since Ford had a practice of mixing and matching FE castings when casting some blocks you can end up with some odd combinations that can lead may astray. For example the CJ blocks that used the rear casting of a 427 side oiler
Have to be careful and look at the whole picture ![]()
__________________
Jeff Speegle SAAC Concours Judge (Helper) MCA Asst Head Judge 4 Shelbys Team Shelby Head Judge |
|
||||
is there a chance that any of these odd balls made it into early model Rangers and if not how can a novice such as myself get a look at the whole picture , vin# distributer placement and what exactly is the side oiler option ![]() thanks for guys for the 101 in shelby-oligy |
|
||||
|
Re: Is a 390 block the same as THE 427 BLK
I wouldn't think a 427 would have made it into a truck since they cost Ford considerably more to build. As for a larger displacement motor being installed in your truck, don't get your hopes up. I think finding a marine engine is very unlikely as most were reverse rotation. And somebody else could have put an industrial motor in the vehicle. I suppose anything is possible but I think it is most likely that you have a 390. Sorry to burst your bubble.
The original design for the FE had the camshaft bearings being fed before the mains. Racing proved this to be a poor design for this block which eventually which became known as a "center oiler". The solution was to add a passageway along the lower left side of the block to directly feed the mains first and then the cam bearings. This required special cam bearings with grooves in the number 2 and 4 positions (front to back) to supply the valve train. If you use the wrong cam bearings, you'll starve the valve train for oil. Oil to the connecting rods is supplied by the crank.
__________________
Roy Simkins '67 G.T. 500 67400F7A03040 '66 G.T. 350 H SFM6S817 Last edited by rsimkins : May 13th, 2008 at 04:06 AM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Non-original block | lnevill | 1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500 | 13 | December 18th, 2007 08:10 PM |
| Engine block for my 68' Shelby | Oregon Shelby | 1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500 | 3 | July 1st, 2006 05:34 PM |
| 2007 Shelby GT500: Big Block Power - Powertrain | rshelby | 2007-2008 Shelby GT500, Shelby GT-H, and Shelby GT Forum | 0 | January 9th, 2006 01:42 PM |
| GT500 block | cobra427 | 1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500 | 12 | August 15th, 2005 08:19 PM |
| Re: 67 Shelby Block Engineering Casting Numbers | Cevon Mclean | Shelby Mustang List | 0 | June 15th, 2005 04:16 PM |