Join Shelby Forums Today

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    West Coast, USA
    Posts
    19
    Rep Power
    2

    '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    I just got another '67 Convertible and I am really wanting to make it a Shelby Clone.. Although the production Shelby's were fastbacks in '67, I want to put the Shelby front end, hood, deck-lid and end caps on my new '67 convertible and it will be red with tan interior.. We've all seen them and they look amazing (in fact, my last '67 was this but never completed, sold and regretted)... I am speaking from an EXTERIOR appearance... I'm not sure which one of my '67s to use, but they are both in great shape, but I'm not going to invest in the engine or suspension anymore than it already has.

    HERE IS MY QUESTION: At the end of the day, would this car be worth more as a stock restored 1967 convertible, or a Shelby '67 convertible clone (still keeping the original parts that get replaced)... There is a great possibility that I will sell this car after its all completed and I am looking for the biggest bang for my buck and the end of the day.. thanks..




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    418
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    My opinion,it is worth more as a properly restored Mustang as a clone is subject to the whim of the marketplace and potential buyer.



    Bill S.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    122
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    Agreed and either way your profit margin would be hugely dependent on the condition of the car when you start(ie rust /originality etc.)as either way it is way to easy to sink more into a car than it will ever be worth....Either way you go if is a relatively plain jane type 67 it will be tough to see much$$$ unless you got it for a steal as 67 vert values arent super high(especially now)my 2 cents and good luck!!!Trent

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    292
    Images
    459
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    There was 1 '67 GT350 ragtop, but I agree with the rest, restored is probably better. When I was a Superformance dealer, we did 65-68 GT350 replicas and we'd do them for the cost of the donor, parts/labor + 10%, and it's an awful lot of work and $$ to try and make them look correct. You might find someone interested in a "semi-clone" where you can make some $$, but probably not.
    The CommissionerB)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,106
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Commissioner View Post
    There was 1 '67 GT350 ragtop, but I agree with the rest, restored is probably better. When I was a Superformance dealer, we did 65-68 GT350 replicas and we'd do them for the cost of the donor, parts/labor + 10%, and it's an awful lot of work and $$ to try and make them look correct. You might find someone interested in a "semi-clone" where you can make some $$, but probably not.
    Sorry to rain on the parade but there were "0" genuine 67 GT350 convertibles. There is 1 genuine 67 GT500 convertible but unlike the misinformation out there it was never built with 67 fiberglass. It was a engineering car that was specifically intended to be a 1968 prototype convertible. It always had 1968 fiberglass not 67. FYI It is under going restoration to it's former glory and will debut at the big Chicago in door muscle car show in November. Bob
    Bob Gaines, Shelby collector, Shelby enthusiast, Shelby concours judge

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    122
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    Correct No 67 GT350 verts.A VERY limited # of 66 GT 350 verts(none for public sale originally).The first true production Gt350 verts would be the 68s,,Production of Gt350 verts would continue into 69/70(with the 70s being leftover 69s slightly modified and given 1970 VINs).Hope this helps clarify things.Trent

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    95
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    I personally prefer the 1967 Shelby to the 1968, it looks cleaner without a lot of the fuss. I have thought about building a 1967 GT500 convertible, to me it comes down to what you want and the resell should be a secondary issue. If you are building the car just to resell then I agree that the stock Mustang would be easier to sell as the market is much larger. If you are building the Shelby because this is what you want then do so and if you later decide to sell it realize that the number of buyers will shrink to those that appreciate what you have done.

    One thing I would not do is do it halfway, either go all the way or don't do it at all. I have look at (as I am sure many on this site have) at cars that are neither stock Mustangs or accurate clones of a Shelby. To me this is just wrong, but maybe it is just me.

    Best of luck on which way you decide.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    122
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    I agree completely if you are going to do a clone go all the way at least on the exterior...To me it looks bizarre (and quite frankly cheap)when someone does the front end and not the back end(or viceversa)or a shorty hood or etc etc etc...My 2 cents.Trent

  9. #9

    Thumbs up Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    Quote Originally Posted by 557 View Post
    I agree completely if you are going to do a clone go all the way at least on the exterior...To me it looks bizarre (and quite frankly cheap)when someone does the front end and not the back end(or viceversa)or a shorty hood or etc etc etc...My 2 cents.Trent
    I totally agree. Mine is an exact clone. Dropped A-arms, roll bar with harness, 10-spokes, correct exhaust tips sticking out to factory spec, I even added the Shelby badge that covers the stock number on the fender. I even used matching character size when making mine. The characters are two different sizes. I am obsessed with details.

    Here is a link to my youtube video of my tail lights:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT-D26teCo0

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,106
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    Quote Originally Posted by 1fordlord View Post
    I totally agree. Mine is an exact clone. Dropped A-arms, roll bar with harness, 10-spokes, correct exhaust tips sticking out to factory spec, I even added the Shelby badge that covers the stock number on the fender. I even used matching character size when making mine. The characters are two different sizes. I am obsessed with details.

    Here is a link to my youtube video of my tail lights:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DT-D26teCo0
    Well you are going to have to ether change your thinking on having exact details or obsees a little more 67 Shelby's didn't have dropped A-arms or sequential taillights.
    Bob Gaines, Shelby collector, Shelby enthusiast, Shelby concours judge

  11. #11

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    Wow, I just noticed this post after so much time. OK, I guess I should clarify... I meant doing it right as in all Shelby glass and visible pieces. You are correct that the 67 didn't have the drop arms or the sequential lights, however I also believe improving when I can and not at the expense of the car. There is no comparison on the "effectively free" handling improvement dropping the arms. I also love the sequential taillights. Mine are even more custom so that when you brake both lights start from the center and go out. Looks awesome. So before you shoot down someone's comment look at the context.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    418
    Rep Power
    2

    Re: '67 Shelby Clone Value?

    Quote Originally Posted by 1fordlord View Post
    Wow, I just noticed this post after so much time. OK, I guess I should clarify... I meant doing it right as in all Shelby glass and visible pieces. You are correct that the 67 didn't have the drop arms or the sequential lights, however I also believe improving when I can and not at the expense of the car. There is no comparison on the "effectively free" handling improvement dropping the arms. I also love the sequential taillights. Mine are even more custom so that when you brake both lights start from the center and go out. Looks awesome. So before you shoot down someone's comment look at the context.
    If you build it for fun, enjoy, if you plan to build it for profit, again, your best bet is to restore it to stock condition. It will be worth MORE that way vs in a modified condition. That is the bottom line.



    Bill S.
    1969 GT500 1584

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 1966 Shelby or Clone?
    By msecrist in forum Lost, Found & Looking
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 12th, 2010, 10:04 AM
  2. have you clone guys ever see this 350r clone
    By pwm74 in forum 1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: May 1st, 2008, 01:09 PM
  3. want to build a 69 shelby clone
    By grd777 in forum 1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: January 29th, 2008, 01:20 PM
  4. 67 Shelby Trans Am Coupe Clone
    By KenG. in forum Open Community Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: December 11th, 2006, 10:52 PM
  5. Shelby Clone
    By Decibels14 in forum 1965-1970 Shelby Mustang GT350 & GT500
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 22nd, 2005, 10:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •